Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12770/2017bail granted

Baijnath Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-16Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12770 of 2017 (2) dt.16-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12770 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -197 Year- 2010 Thana -MINAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Baijnath Ram son of Ramchandra Ram, resident of Village- Panapur Bangala Tola, P.S. Meenapur, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mrs. Bela Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 16-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 20.08.2016 in connection with Meenapur P.S. Case No. 197 of 2010 for the offences alleged under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely on suspicion and he is not named in the F.I.R. Petitioner's name has surfaced on the confessional statement of coaccused Jaylal Bhagat, the latter having been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 14337 of 2011. No recovery of any incriminating articles has been made from the petitioner who claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Meenapur P.S. Case No. 197 of 2010, on the following conditions:-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12770 of 2017 (2) dt.16-03-2017 (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T