Sonu Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar @ Saurabh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61129 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sonu Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar @ Saurabh Singh, male, S/o Satyendra Kumar Singh, R/o Village - Rampur Bakhra, P.S - Bhagwanpur, District - Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Subhash Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-09-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 135 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 115, 118(1), 109, 74, 351(2), 352, 324(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (B.N.S.).
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has alleged that the petitioner and one Abhay Kumar Singh had
2/4 assaulted him as well as his son with the butt of the pistol and thereafter, they had damaged the motorcycle which was parked there and fled away.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has falsely been implicated in this case on account of a dispute, with regard to the drainage, which exist between the family of the informant as well as the petitioner. It has been submitted that there is no allegation of firing against the petitioner; rather from the plain reading of the F.I.R., it would be evident that nothing specific has been attributed against the petitioner. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
3/4 satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 135 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with corresponding Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (B.N.S.S.) as well as subject to the following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close relative.
(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date of the trial and shall cooperate in the investigation.
(iii) In case of absence for two consecutive occasions or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail-bonds of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the concerned learned Court below. (iv) If the petitioner, in future, is found to be involved in similar nature of offence(s), the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail-bonds.
(v) The learned Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that he has concealed his criminal antecedent, the Court below shall take necessary steps for cancellation of his bail-bonds. However, the acceptance of bail-bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
4/4
7. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Sourendra Pandey, J) Praveen-II/- U T