Patna High CourtCWJC/13521/2013dismissed

Vikas Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-10-27Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13521 of 2013 ===========================================================

1. Vikas Kumar, S/O Vishwanath Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Sonapur (Bharath), P.O- Hanspur, P.S- Nayan Gaon, District- Begusarai .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director General of Police, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Chairman, Central Selection Board- Cum- Inspector General of Police, Bihar Military Police, Bihar.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the State : Mr. J.K. Roy-1, S.C.-13 For the CSBC : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Adv. Mr. Vivek Anand, Adv.

Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra, Adv.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 27-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Central Selection Board.

In this case, the petitioner has sought a relief to cancel the final result dated 11.8.2011 issued by the Central Selection Board for recruitment of Constables, whereby the petitioner has been declared unsuccessful.

The documents annexed with the counter affidavit shows that the petitioner has applied in the category of Home

Patna High Court CWJC No.13521 of 2013 dt.27-10-2016 2/2 Guard as a scheduled caste candidate, but at the time of physical verification he did not produce the corroborative documents to show that he belongs to the Home Guard category, further, Annexure-D to the counter affidavit itself shows that the petitioner has filled up the application under Home Guard category, but at the time of submission of documents, he could not be able to produce the same. Hence, his candidature was rejected and he could not be selected.

In such view of the matter, this Court does not find any error in rejecting the candidature of the petitioner. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N/A.

Uploading Date 29.10.2016 Transmission Date