Patna High CourtL.P.A/178/2018disposed

Kumari Anju v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-05Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.178 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3940 of 2013 ====================================================== Kumari Anju, Wife of Sashikant, R/o Village-Dhurgaoh, P.S.-Ekanger sarai, District-Naland ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Commissioner Patna Division At Patna.

4. The Director, Directorate of I.C.D.S., Patna

5. The District Magistrate, Nalanda District-Nalanda.

6. The District program Officer Nalanda District-Nalanda.

7. The Child Development Program Officer, Ekangarsarai Block-Ekangarsarai District-Nalanda.

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Pancahayat Raj Dhurgaon Block-Ekangar Sari District-Nalanda.

9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Dhurgaon Block- Ekangar Sarai DistrictNalanda.

10. Sindhu Kumari, Wife of Chiranjeevi Kumar Sinha Resident of Village- P.O.- Dhurgaoh P.S.-Ekangarsarai District-Nalanda.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Brij Bihari Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 05-07-2018 Considering the fact that the impugned order passed by the Writ Court is only a remand order and the Writ Court has not gone into the question on merit and has relegated the issue of appointment of Anganwadi Sevika to be considered by the competent authority on remand, we see no reason to make any indulgence into the matter. The Letters Patent Appeal stands

Patna High Court LPA No.178 of 2018(4) dt.05-07-2018 2/2 disposed of with direction to the authority concerned to proceed with the matter and decide it in accordance with law after hearing all concerned, if not already done, within a period of 60 days.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./- U