← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3001/2025dismissed

Nawal Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar

2025-11-21Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3001 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3061 of 2018 ====================================================== Nawal Kishore Singh Son of Late Jagdish Singh, Resident of Village- Gosai Math, P.S.- Gopalpur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar Patna namely Sri Amrit Lal Meena.

2.

Sri Arvind Kumar Chaudhary, the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Sanjiv Kumar, the Finance Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

Sri Santosh Kumar Mall, the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

Sri Gunjan Kumar, the Deputy Secretary, Command Area Development Directorate, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6.

Sri Gunjan Kumar, Sone Command Area Development Agency, Patna through its Secretary.

7.

Smt. Seema Kumari, Area Development Commissioner -cum- Chairman, Sone Command Area Development Agency, Patna.

8.

Sri Sanjay Kumar Gupta, the Secretary, Sone Command Area Development Agency, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, AC to GA-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 21-11-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):

for issuance of a rule of contempt against the container opposite parties for their disobedience, deliberate violation and non compliance of the order dated

Patna High Court MJC No.3001 of 2025(3) dt.21-11-2025 2/2 19.09.2023 passed by Hon'ble Mr Justice Rajiv Roy in CWJC No 3061 of 2018.

3. The show cause of the opposite parties are on record and Annexure-B shows that on 26.06.2024 itself, the claim of the petitioner has been negated.

4. It is an ill-advised contempt petition which has been filed almost one year after the said order was passed, dismissed.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U