Patna High CourtMJC/2405/2015withdrawn

M/S Sulanki Construction Through Its Partner Akhileshwar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-02-16Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2405 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 942 of 2014 ====================================================== M/s Sulanki Construction through its Partner Akhileshwar Singh Son of Ratan Singh Resident of Village-Chhota Bariyarpur, Ps. Chhatauni, District East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Mr. Vinay kumar, Principal Secretary, Rural works Department, Government of Bihar,Patna.

3. Sri Kamlesh Chaudhary, Engineer in Chief, Rural works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. Ram Ji Chaudhary Chief Engineer-3 Rural works Department, Government of Bihar,Patna.

5. Mr. Nirmal Kumar, Superintending Engineer, Rural works Department, Motihari, East Champaran Bihar,

6. Mr. Ajay Kumat Tiwari, Executive Engineer, Rural works Department , works Division Areraj, Motihari , East Champaran ,Bihar.

7. Mr. Radha Kanti shashi , Assistant Engineer, Rural works Department , works Division Areraj, Motihari , East Champaran ,bihar.

8. Vinod kumar Singh, Junior Engineer, Rural works Department , works Division Areraj, Motihari , East Champaran ,bihar.

9. Mr. R.k. Mahajan, Director (Madhyamik Shiksha) ,Department of Education, Bihar,Patna.

10. Mr. Kumar Sahjanand, District Education Officer, Motihari East champaran Bihar.

11. Mr. Mahant Yadav, Head Master Sri Ram Dawan Vibishan High School , Rakhaura Motihari ,East Champaran Bihar. .... .... Opposite parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court MJC No.2405 of 2015 (4) dt.16-02-2018 2/2 grievance of the petitioner has now been redressed and, therefore, the application has become infructuous.

It is, thus, dismissed as infructuous.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U