Tinku Singh @ Avinash Singh @ Abhinash Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61392 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2024 Thana- NAUGACHIA District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Tinku Singh @ Avinash Singh @ Abhinash Singh S/o- Anil Singh @ Patho Singh R/o - Tetri, P.S - Naugachia, District - Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State .
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of Arms Act.
3 . As per the prosecution case , informant namely , Rajesh Yadav alleged that on 09th April 2024 , while tending near the railway over-bridge , there was some hot talk between the brother of informant namely , Neeraj Yadav , this petitioner and other co-accused persons and all of a sudden this petitioner took a weapon from other co-accused and shot upon brother of informant due to which he sustained firearm injury and died while taking to the hospital.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61392 of 2025(3) dt.03-11-2025 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged. There is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence . Only suspicion has been raised against this petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 10.04.2024 .
5 . However, learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that there is direct and specific allegation that this petitioner along with other coaccused persons caused firearm injury to the brother of informant due to which he died.
6. Considering the nature of accusation, prayer for bail of the petitioner is refused. However, since petitioner is in custody since 10.04.2024, learned Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial, within the period of one year from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T