Patna High CourtL.P.A/138/2016dismissed

Krishna Mohan Prasad v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited And ORS

2017-02-07Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.138 of 2016 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7000 of 2015 ====================================================== Krishna Mohan Prasad, Son of late Dwarika Prasad, resident of village Sarafuddinpur, P.O. Singhara, P.s Dulhin Bazar, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner-Appellant/s

Versus

1. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited Bailey Road, Vidhyut Bhawan, Patna through its Secretary.

2. The Secretary, Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited, Patna.

3. The Electrical Executive Engineer, transmission Circle, Dehri-on-Sone Aurangabad.

4. The Executive Engineer, Transmission Division, Dehri-On-Sone, Aurangabad.

5. The Executive Engineer, Transmission Division , Jakkanpur, Patna.

6. The Executive Engineer, Transmission Division, Biharsharif (Nalanda).

7. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Transmission Sub Division, Ara (Bhojpur).

8. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Transmission Sub Division (Anchal) Dehri-On-Sone, Aurangabad.

9. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Transmission Sub Division (Anchal) Jakkanpur, Patna.

10. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Transmission Sub Division (Anchal) Harnaut, Biharsharif, (Nalanda).

.... .... Respondents-Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Anil Kr Singh No. 6, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Chandra Srivastava, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

Patna High Court LPA No.138 of 2016 (4) dt.07-02-2017 2/2 ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLETHE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 07-02-2017 Learned counsel for the parties state that the present Letters Patent Appeal is rendered infructuous since as per the policy decision, payments have been made to the appellant. Dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Hemant Gupta, ACJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Sunil/- U