Patna High CourtL.P.A/384/2016dismissed

Brij Nandan Singh v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited And ORS

2017-04-04Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.384 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7038 of 2015 =========================================================== Brij Nandan Singh, son of Shri Sheo Pujari Singh, Quarter No. 34, D.V.C. Colony, Jakkanpur P.S. - Gardanibagh, Working as Assistant Operator in Sampatchak, Patna.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited through its Chairman, Bailey Road, Vidyut Bhawan Patna.

2. The General Manager -cum - Chief Engineer, Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited, Transmission Zone, Punaikchak Patna.

3. The C.M.D. Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited Vidhut Bhawan, Patna.

4. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Transmission Circle, Patna.

5. The Executive Engineer, Transmission Sub Division, Khagaul, Punaichak, Patna.

6. The Accounts Office, Transmission Circle Patna.

7. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Transmission Sub Division, Hatidah, Patna. .... .... Respondents- Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Gautam Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 04-04-2017 Re.: Interlocutory Application No.1626 of 2016 The delay in filing of this Appeal is condoned. Re.: Letters Patent Appeal No.384 of 2016 In the matter of payment of overtime wages to the petitioner, apart from the fact that there was a delay of more than 8 years in approaching the Court, the learned Writ Court has given various

Patna High Court LPA No.384 of 2016 dt.04-04-2017 2/2 reasons for rejecting the claim, i.e. primarily the records were not available, the petitioner accepted the overtime wages paid and, therefore, refused to interfere into the matter. Keeping in view the aforesaid, we see no reason to make any indulgence into the matter. The appeal is dismissed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Sunil/- AFR/NAFR N. A. F. R CAV DATE N. A.

Uploading Date 08.04.2017 Transmission Date