Prahlad Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16490 of 2022 ====================================================== Prahlad Ray Son of Gonaur Ray, Resident of Village Buniyadi Tola, Post Office Posua, Police Station Riga District Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat Building, Bailey Road, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat Building, Bailey Road, Patna. 3.

The District Collector, Sitamarhi.

4.

The Block Development Officer, Riga, District Sitamarhi. 5.

The Circle Officer, Riga, District Sitamarhi. 6.

The Block Panchayati Raj officer, Riga, District Sitamarhi. 7.

The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Pasua Patania, Block Riga, District Sitamarhi. 8.

Umesh Ray Son of Kirat Ray, Resident of Village Buniyadi Tola, Post Office Posua, Police Station Riga District Sitamarhi. 9.

Dinesh Ray Son of Kirat Ray, Resident of Village Buniyadi Tola, Post Office Posua, Police Station Riga District Sitamarhi. 10.

Mahesh Ray Son of Kirat Ray, Resident of Village Buniyadi Tola, Post Office Posua, Police Station Riga District Sitamarhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Ms.Archana Meenakshee, G.P.-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ application may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3 (Collector, Sitamarhi) to dispose of the representation of the petitioner which was pending since

Patna High Court CWJC No.16490 of 2022(2) dt.06-08-2024 2/2 12.09.2022.

3. In view of the aforesaid, this writ application stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3 (Collector, Sitamarhi) to dispose of the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and if so required, the Collector, Sitamarhi is directed to hear the all concerned parties.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U