← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18610/2019disposed

Md. Omar Faruque v. The State Of Bihar

2019-09-09The Chief Justice-2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18610 of 2019 ====================================================== Md. Omar Faruque son of Md. Sadique Ansari resident of Village- Fatehabad, P.S. Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur, presently posted as Madarsa Teacher in Madrsa Fathul Uloom, Fatehabad, P.S. Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education Tirhut Division, Chapra. 5.

The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. 6.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Muzaffarpur, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 7.

The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Vidyapati Marg, Patna through the Secretary.

8.

The Chairman, The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Vidyapati Marg, Patna.

9.

The Secretary, The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Vidyapati Marg, Patna.

10.

The Head Maulbi/ Headmaster Madarsa Fathul Uloom, Fatehabad, P.S. Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.

11.

The Secretary, Madarsa Fathul Uloom, Fatehabad, P.S. Paroo, DistrictMuzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Madarsa Board :

Mr. Aslam Ansari, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 09-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Aslam Ansari on behalf of the Madarsa Board as well as Shri Subhash Chandra Mishra on behalf of the State.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18610 of 2019 dt.09-09-2019 2/2 The claim is that the payment admissible to the petitioner would be from the date of initial appointment and not from the date of joining.

Learned counsel for the parties have invited the attention of the Court to a direction issued in the similar matter on 11th April, 2018 in C.W.J.C. No. 7322 of 2017 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition).

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the records, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondent No. 5 to examine the claim of the petitioner and pass appropriate order as expeditiously as possible preferably within three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. (Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ) P.K.P./- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 09.09.2019 Transmission Date