← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65375/2023allowed

Dr. Inderjit Kumar @ Dr. Indrajit @ Bhulan v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-13Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65375 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-315 Year-2023 Thana- CHHATAUNI District- East Champaran ====================================================== DR. INDERJIT KUMAR @ DR. INDRAJIT @ BHULAN S/O ARUN KUMAR SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MISSION MOHALA, PSCHHATAUNI, DIST- EAST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 13-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 341, 384, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b) and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. It is a case of demand of ransom money from the informant by the accused persons including this petitioner. It is further alleged that the accused persons has also abused the informant and made fire.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to old dispute. He has committed no offence. There is no specific overt

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65375 of 2023(2) dt.13-10-2023 2/2 act against the petitioner. The petitioner is a dentist and he runs his clinic at Amar Chhatauni, but at the instance of his hidden enemies he has been implicated in the present case. There has been inordinate delay of about nine days in lodging the FIR. No any ransom money has been executed. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 15.07.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 315 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T