← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/1612/2013disposed

Seema Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-23Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1612 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4474 of 2010 ====================================================== Seema Kumari Wife Of Mahendra Goswami, Daughter Of Ram Deo Goswami Resident Of Village- Midhkuri, Post Office- Biju Bigha, BlockMeskaur, District- Nawada .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The District Superintendent Of Education, Nawada

3. The Block Development Officer Meskaur, District- Nawada

4. The Gram Panchayat, Through Its Mukhiya, Biju Bigha, Post OfficeBiju Bigha, Block- Meskaur, District- Nawada

5. The Secretary Gram Panchyat, Biju Bigha, Post Office- Biju Bigha, Block- Meskaur, District- Nawada

6. The Member, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Nawada

7. Kumari Meera Wife Of Sri Shashi Bhushan Prasad Resident Of Village + Post Office- Meshkaur, District- Nawada .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Virendra Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 23-04-2018 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we find no error in the order passed by the Learned Writ Court warranting reconsideration. However, in case the petitioner is entitled to challenge the original order annulling the entire selection process, the petitioner may challenge the same, if permissible under law, before the appropriate statutory authority.

Patna High Court LPA No.1612 of 2013 (23) dt.23-04-2018 2/2 With the aforesaid, the matter stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) N.H./- U