Pintu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43032 of 2015 (3) dt.10-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.43032 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -497 Year- 2014 Thana -SHEKHPURA District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== Pintu Yadav Son of Arjun Yadav Resident of Village - Makhdumpur, Police Station - Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhpura. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Mukherjee For the Opposite Party : Mr. Satyavrat Verma(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-11-2015 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.
The petitioner is languishing in jail since 13.04.2015 in a case instituted under Sections 498A, 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Sheikhpura P.S.Case No.497 of 2014 pending in the Court of CJM, Sheikhpura. As per prosecution case, the sister of the informant was married with petitioner in the year 2014 and after marriage the victim was residing in her Sasural but Sasural people used to torture her due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry and after that petitioner also assaulted the victim by means of garsa. the victim sustained injury and thereafter died.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43032 of 2015 (3) dt.10-11-2015 the petitioner is in custody since 13.04.2015. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering of evidence against the petitioner.
On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR and he is the husband of the deceased. From perusal of para-5 of the case diary, it is evident that the daughter of the deceased has admitted that her mother was done to death by this petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioner, same is dismissed.
Anyhow, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Sudhir Singh, J) B.Kr./- U T