← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/1663/2016disposed

Shrikant Chaubey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-14Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1663 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3174 of 2012 =========================================================== Shrikant Chaubey, S/o Late Ramadhar Chaubey, resident of Village- Sultanpur, P.O.- Upari, District- Kaimur.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary Art, culture and youth Department, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

2. The Secretary, Art, Culture and youth Department, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

3. The Director (Youth-Welfare) cum Dy. Secretary, Art, Culture and youth Department, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

4. The District Education Officer, Rohtas.

5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas.

6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

7. The Accountant General, U.P., Allahabad.

8. Union of India through the Secretary, H.R.D. Department, New Delhi. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Bankey Bihari Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. RAJ KISHORE ROY-GP18 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 14-12-2017 Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar and U.P. and counsel for the State without going into the merits of the adjudication made by the learned Single Judge dated 21.07.2016 keeping in mind the recent development, which is a letter no.1449-1457 dated 19.09.2017, which has been addressed to the Director, GPG Directorate, Pant Bhawan, Government of Bihar where GPF amount prior to 01.10.1976

Patna High Court LPA No.1663 of 2016 dt.14-12-2017 deducted by Accountant General, U.P., Allahabad is reflected in the said communication which includes the name of the present appellant at serial no.4, he can very well approach the Director, Provident Fund to release the said amount keeping in mind the said communication provided the said communication in question is authentic in nature. Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the above observations.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date18.12.2017 Transmission Date