Chhotoo Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14963 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -345 Year- 2016 Thana -DANAPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Chhotoo Singh son of Bhola Singh resident of mohalla - Galapar, Danapur, P.S. Danapur, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri S.M. Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 345 of 2016 registered under sections 302 and 120B and the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The accusation is that on 7.8.2016 at about 8 P.M., Ashok Jaishwal, father-in-law of the informant was standing in front of his house. At that time, three accused including petitioner named in FIR along with unknown are started indiscriminate firing in which he sustained injury and died in hospital in course of treatment. Her father-in-law was being threatened for dire consequences since some days.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14963 of 2017 (3) dt.28-04-2017 2/2 submits that Somiya Kumari, daughter of one co-accused Rishideo Singh fell in love with one of the sons of deceased and ultimately both performed marriage due to that reason there was some grudge in between deceased and Rishideo Singh. The petitioner is son of Bhola Singh and nephew of Rishideo Singh due to that reason he has also been implicated in this case. Further submission is that it has come in course of investigation that some professionals were hired by Rishidev Singh for committing murder of the deceased. Having considered the facts and circumstances and nature of the allegation and injuries supported in the post-mortem, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Ravi/- U T