← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60914/2025allowed

Anup Kumar Singh @ Anup Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-10Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60914 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2025 Thana- MAIGRA District- Gaya ====================================================== Anup Kumar Singh @ Anup Kumar S/o Kishori Singh R/o Village - Bikuakala (Bikua), P.S - Maigra, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rahul Kumar Dubey, Adv.

Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Maigra P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per prosecution case, co-accused Rakesh Kumar was apprehended alongwith a motorcycle. On demand of relevant paper with regard to possession of the said vehicle, he could not produce any document. The apprehended accused disclosed the name of the present petitioner as the person from whom he has received the said vehicle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the first information report and he has been falsely implicated

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60914 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 in this case. Except disclosure of the co-accused, there is nothing on record to connect the petitioner with the alleged occurrence. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The seizure list has not been made as per law. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent.

5. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, cargument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Maigra P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) mcverma/- U T