Rohit Kuamr v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72779 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2019 Thana- SAKURABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== ROHIT KUAMR Son of Late Suraj Dyal Choudhary, Resident of VillageKoelma, P.S.- Haspura, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-04-2023 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 205 of 2019, registered for offence punishable under Sections 366, 457/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that allegation against the petitioner is that he abducted the daughter-in-law of the informant, but the alleged victim, in her statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has stated that she went with the petitioner with her own sweet

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72779 of 2022(3) dt.19-04-2023 2/2 will, as she was not liking her first husband. On the other hand, the learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Jehanabad in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 205 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

(ii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in the similar type of offence, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application before the court below for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner and the learned court below will take decision in accordance with law. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T