Ranju Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15077 of 2017 (2) dt.26-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15077 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2017 Thana -PAROO District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Ranju Devi, wife of Birendra Rai, Resident of Village- Thengpur, P.S.- Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Parroo P.S. Case No. 12 of 2017, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 324, 325, 326, 506, 307, 353, 332 and 333 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is that 19 persons named in the F.I.R. including the petitioner reached at the door of Ajay Rai and started to cause assault. In that course, this petitioner attacked through Farsa causing injury at the left ear of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner being lady has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 12.01.2017. It is further submitted that while injury shown at

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15077 of 2017 (2) dt.26-04-2017 the right ear of the informant but nature of injury has not been detailed in the injury report.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Muzafarpur, in connection with Parroo P.S. Case No. 12 of 2017. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T