Basukinath Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63423 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2019 Thana- DHURAIYA District- Banka ====================================================== Basukinath Singh Son of Late Rameshwar Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Baderi, P.S.- Dhoraiya, Dist.- Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Vigilance Investigation Bureau Through Director General, Bihar, Patna Patna 3.

The Chairman, Sankrit Siksha Board Bihar, Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the State : Mr.Ajay Mishra, APP For the Vigilance : Mr. Anjani Kumar, (L/O Vigilance) Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Adv.

For the BSSB : Mr. S.S. Sundaram, Adv. Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 20-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner in this case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Dhoraiya P.S. Case No.54 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the allegation in the FIR the petitioner has obtained appointment as Panchayat Teacher on the basis of forged document. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has committed no offence and he has been removed from service.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63423 of 2019(3) dt.20-11-2019 2/2 Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the vigilance have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein it appears that the allegation against the petitioner is that of using a forged Madhyama certificate but the submission of the petitioner is that he has done B.Ed. and his certificate of B.Ed. was also verified and found correct and genuine as also that the petitioner has already been removed from the service and similarly situated accused has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by a learned coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr.Misc.No.67940 of 2019, let the provisional bail earlier granted to the petitioner vide order dated 21.10.2019 be confirmed on the same bail bond.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T