Abhishek Kr. @ Abhishek Singh @ Abhishek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62401 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2025 Thana- Madhubani T District- Purnia ====================================================== Abhishek Kr. @ Abhishek Singh @ Abhishek Kumar S/o- Raj Kumar @ Singh Raj Kumar @ Sri Raj Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Kadha Gola Jhitkiya PS- Korha, Distt.- Katihar, Presently residing at Hanumanbag, Railway Gumti Ward No. 30, P.s.- K. Hat, Distt. - Purnea, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhola Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Madhubani P.S. Case No. 92 of 2025 dated 15.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 309(6) of the B.N.S., Sections 8(c), 21(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act. and 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, police apprehended the petitioner and from his possession, one country made pistol, 9 live cartridges and 3.10 gm. of smack/brown sugar like substance were recovered. The petitioner also disclosed the name of the other accused person as Rajesh Kumar Singh who fled away from the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62401 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 The seized contraband is of small quantity. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents in which he is on bail as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.04.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Purnea in connection with Madhubani P.S. Case No. 92 of 2025 with the condition :- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T