Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16341/2017allowed

Braj Mohan Sah @ Brij Mohan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16341 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -62 Year- 2016 Thana -BELA District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Braj Mohan Sah @ Brij Mohan Sah Son of Ram Chander Sah, resident of village - Lohkhar, P.S. Sonebarsa, District - Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-04-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 16.2.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 5803 of 2017 with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner from Annexure-3 series that thereafter petitioner has moved before the learned court below but his prayer was rejected on the ground that no fresh ground has come in favour of the petitioner. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the observation made earlier, let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16341 of 2017 (2) dt.12-04-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-I, Sitamarhi, in connection with Bela P.S. Case no. 62 of 2016 with the following conditions:- (i) Both the bailors of the petitioner shall be local persons having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

This application stands disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T