Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68531/2024rejected

Shailesh Kumar @ Toto Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-17Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68531 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-622 Year-2023 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Shailesh Kumar @ Toto Paswan S/O- Lalu Paswan Village- Baijpura PsBelaganj Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prithivi Raj Singh, Advocate For the Informant :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Belaganj P.S Case No. 622 of 2023 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 34 of the I.P.C.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, it is alleged that petitioner along with co-accused have killed the husband of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent except this case. He also submits that petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68531 of 2024(2) dt.17-01-2025 2/2 offence. He has been falsely been implicated in this case.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. From perusal of the F.I.R., seizure list, impugned order and case diary, it appears that name of the petitioner surfaced during investigation and some witnesses disclosed the involvement of the petitioner in the case which is also mentioned in case dairy. Prima facie, it appears involvement of the petitioner in this case.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T