Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16810/2017disposed

Rabdin Ansari @ Rabin Ansari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-18Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16810 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2016 Thana -KATEYA District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Rabdin Ansari @ Rabin Ansari, son of Bhoj Ansari,

2. Mofil Mian, Son of Akalu Mian,

3. Samsul Mian, Son of Raj Mohammad Mian.

4. Kalamddin Mian, son of Nabi Mian.

5. Nazara Khatoon @ Baby Khatoon, Wife of Mustaque Ansari All 1 to 5 Resident of Village- Batal Chorahan @ Batal Churaha, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey No-5 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-04-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Kateya P.S.Case No.37 of 2016 (G.R.No.481 of 2016) registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 337, 338, 332, 333, 307, 353, 427, 504, 506 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and there is no allegation against the petitioners under Section 353 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. It is further submitted that nothing specific has been alleged against the petitioners in the F.I.R. and the other

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16810 of 2017 (2) dt.18-04-2017 2/2 accused persons having similar allegation have been granted bail by another Bench of this Court.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, however, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below and considering the fact that the other co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail by the another Bench of this Court, will pass appropriate order without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U