← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17329/2017disposed

Vinod Rai @ Vinod Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-05-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17329 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -222 Year- 2015 Thana -SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSARAN ======================================================

1. Vinod Rai @ Vinod Kumar Son of Chandrama Rai Resident of VillageDhodhraha, P.S. Mahammadpur, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sanita Devi D/o Ram Vilash Rai, Resident of Village- Padmoul, P.S.- Masharakh, District- Saran at Chapra.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tej Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 09-05-2017 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Complaint case No. 222 of 2015 for the offences allegedly committed by the petitioner under Section 498(A), 323, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is husband and he is ready to keep his wife. The petitioner never subjected his wife to any sorts of torture. Considering the willingness of the petitioner to keep his wife, the above named petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and the court below

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17329 of 2017 (2) dt.09-05-2017 2/2 shall grant provisional bail to the petitioner for four months on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in Complaint Case No. 222 of 2015.

The court below shall make all efforts for resolving the dispute between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved amicably between the parties, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed. In case the dispute is not resolved, the court below shall pass orders on the prayer for provisional bail of the petitioner on its own merit immediately after expiry of four months, in accordance with law. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U T