Danish Daniyal @ Danish Daneyal @ Danish Daniyal Sadique v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61807 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2022 Thana- CIVIL LINE District- Gaya ====================================================== DANISH DANIYAL @ DANISH DANEYAL @ DANISH DANIYAL SADIQUE Son of Sadique Daniyal R/V- Meduka, P.S- Aanti, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Uzaifa Simaab Daughter of Md. Reyazuddin Resident of Mohalla- Road No. 2, Karimganj, P.S- Civil Line, Dist- Gaya ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha, Snr. Adv.
Mr. Bhola Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Ashish Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Ravi Shankar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sharda Kumari, APP.
Mr. Manish Kumar No.2, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498 (A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner, who is husband of informant, is said to have tortured upon the informant in association of his family members over the dowry demand. They also tried to kill her. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61807 of 2022(5) dt.18-05-2023 2/2 the demand of dowry. He is still ready to keep her with full honour and dignity but in the Court below, the informant refused to live with her husband in her matrimonial home. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182. In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Civil Line P.S. Case No. 150 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T