← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/1169/2018withdrawn

Saraswati Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-01-07The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1169 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15631 of 2018 ====================================================== Saraswati Devi Wife of Santlal Mahto, Resident of Chitarsenpur, PS Sonepur, District- Saran at Chapra, Ex- Pramukh, Block Panchayat Samiti, Sonepur, District Saran at Chapra.

... ... Appellant

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

5.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sonepur, District Saran at Chapra. 6.

The Block Development Officer-cum- Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Sonepur, District Sa 7.

Shyam Babu Rai, Son of not known to the appellant, Presently Up-Pramukh, Block Panchayat Samiti, Sonepur, District Saran at Chapra. 8.

Raj Kumari Sharma, wife of not known to the appellant, 9.

Rajeev Kumar Rai, Son of not known to the appellant, 10.

Baby Devi, wife of not known to the appellant, 11.

Prabhavati Devi, wife of not known to the appellant, 12.

Meena Devi, wife of not known to the appellant, 13.

Ramesh Kumar, Son of not known to the appellant, 14.

Shiv Sagar Manjhi, Son of not known to the appellant, 15.

Manorma Devi, wife of not known to the appellant, 16.

Mamta Devi, wife of not known to the appellant, 17.

Ruby Devi, wife of not known to the appellant, 18.

Rina Devi, wife of not known to the appellant, 19.

Uday Kumar Singh, Son of not known to the appellant, 20.

Mithileshwari Devi, wife of not known to the appellant, 21.

Dharmsheela Devi, wife of not known to the appellant, 22.

Devanand Sahni, wife of not known to the appellant, 23.

Munni Devi, wife of not known to the appellant, 24.

Prem Kumar Gupta, Son of not known to the appellant, 25.

Sunil Kumar Rai, Son of not known to the appellant,

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1169 of 2018(2) dt.07-01-2020 2/3 26.

Pankaj Kumar, Son of not known to the appellant, 27.

Madhu Kumari, wife of not known to the appellant, 28.

Ajay Kumar, Son of not known to the appellant, 29.

Ravi Kumar, Son of not known to the appellant, 30.

Nityanand Singh, Son of not known to the appellant, 31.

Poonam Singh, wife of not known to the appellant, 32.

Raja Kumar, Son of not known to the appellant, 33.

Radheshyam Mahto, Son of not known to the appellant, 34.

Rita Devi, wife of not known to the appellant, 35.

Ranjeet Kumar Rai, Son of not known to the appellant, 36.

Mamta Devi, wife of not known to the appellant, Respondent Nos. 8 to 36 are elected members of Block Panchayat Samiti, Sonepur, District Saran at Chapra through the Block Development Officercum- Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Sonepur, P.O. and P.S. Sonepur, District Saran at Chapra.

37.

The State Election Commission through the Secretary, Sone Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Beer Chand Patel Path, ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant :

Mr.Shashi Bhushan Kumar -Manglam, Advocate For the Commission :

Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Advocate Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 07-01-2020 The present memorandum of appeal is directed against the part of judgment and order dated 10.08.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWJC No. 15631 of 2018 whereby, while issuing notice to the private respondents, the prayer for stay of election scheduled to be held on 17.08.2018 for the post of Pramukh of Block Panchayat Samiti, Sonepur has been rejected.

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1169 of 2018(2) dt.07-01-2020 3/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal.

Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) BT/- U