Sachchi Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Collector And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3221 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11599 of 2013 ====================================================== Sachchi Devi wife of Late Shri Nawal Kishore Prasad, resident of VillageMuluktand, Post Mandi Kharagpur, P.S. Haveli Kharagpur, District Munger 811213.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through The Collector and Ors son of not known, Revenue and Land Reform Department, Munger.

2.

Sri Anand Sharma, son of not known, the District Magistrate cum Collector, Munger.

3.

Sri Shankar Prasad Singh, son of not known, the Chief Engineer, Rural Works Department, Munger.

4.

Sri Vijay Kumar, son of not known, the District Land Acquisition Officer, Munger.

5.

Sri Sanjeev Kumar, son of not known, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Haveli Kharagpur, District Munger.

6.

Md. Anisurahman, son of not known, Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Munger.

7.

Sri Purnendu Verma, son of not known, Circle Officer, Haveli Kharagpur, District Munger.

8.

Sri Ashok Kumar, son of not known, District Planning Officer, Munger. 9.

Sri Bal Krishna Bhalotiya, son of not known, Contractor, R/o. Jamui Bazar, P.O. P.S. Jamui, District Jamui, Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madan Prasad Singh No-2, Adv, For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their

Patna High Court MJC No.3221 of 2018(4) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 willful disobedience of the order dated 20.11.2014 passed in CWJC No. 11599 of 2013."

3. A show cause has come on behalf of the opposite party and learned State Counsel has taken this Court to paragraph 4 to show that the land of petitioner, Sachchi Devi has not been utilised for the construction.

4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U