Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67846 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2024 Thana- ROH District- Nawada ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Son of Ravindra Yadav village- Kajichak, Ps- Roh, DistNawadah ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dinesh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 121 of 2024 dated 20.04.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown miscreants are alleged to have ridden on a motorcycle and snatched the key of the motorcycle and mobile phone of the informant after assaulting him and they also snatched two A.T.M. cards, Aadhar Card and Rs. 1500/- from one Nikhil Kumar Verma and they also took away the documents kept in the dickey of the motorcycle of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67846 of 2024(2) dt.08-10-2024 2/2 the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case in his self confessional statement before police which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. No T.I.P. has been conducted by the prosecution. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has three criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 31.05.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nawada in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 121 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T