Pappu Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50246 of 2015 (2) dt.04-01-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50246 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -187 Year- 2014 Thana -DARIYAPUR District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Pappu Kumar Rai, S/o Pulish Rai resident of Village- Sarai Saho, P.S. Dariyapur, District- Saran at Chapra.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Pd. Nat(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 04-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 187 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, stolen motorcycles as per seizure list were recovered from the house of Karan Kumar and Jitendra Rai and they stated that they have purchased the same from the petitioner. Submission is of false implication and that both Karan Kumar and Jitendra Rai have already been allowed bail vide order dated 31.03.2015 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 48901 of 2014 by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court and from possession of the petitioner nothing has been recovered and, as such, the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50246 of 2015 (2) dt.04-01-2016 petitioner, who is suffering in custody since 13.07.2015, deserves sympathetic consideration, to which learned A.P.P. does not oppose.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, Pappu Kumar Rai, is also directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned C.J.M., Saran at Chapra arising out of Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 187 of 2014 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U