← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17076/2016disposed

Pashupati Paswan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-20Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17076 of 2016 =========================================================== Pashupati Paswan son of Late Jagdish Paswan, Resident of Village- Madarpur, P.S.- Maheshkhut, Distsrict- Khagaria, a retired District Co-operative Officer, Banka.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Co-operative Department, Vikas Bhawan Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary Co-operative Department Vikas Bhawan Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The Joint Secretary Co-operative Department Vikas Bhawan Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The Registrar Co-operative Societies, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

5. The Accountant General Birchand Patel Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For Accountant General : Mr. Anjani Kumar Sharan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Swapnil Kumar Singh, AC to GP-19 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-07-2018 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State and Accountant General have assisted the Court.

2. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs :

" A. For regular pension admissible to the petitioner under the law.

B. For payment of death cum retirement gratuity admissible to the petitioner.

C. For final payment of General Provident Fund contribution."

Patna High Court CWJC No.17076 of 2016 dt.20-07-2018 2/2

3. As per the stand taken in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no.5 and respondent no.3, all admitted dues of the petitioner have been paid. There is no rejoinder to the same, despite copy of the counter affidavits having been served on learned counsel for the petitioner on 16.04.2017 and 20.07.2017.

4. Taking note of the aforesaid and also the fact that nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition, the Court can only presume that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) N.H./- AFR/NAFR U