Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16820/2017bail granted

Uday Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-11Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16820 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2015 Thana -CHEWRA District- SEKHPURA ======================================================

1. Uday Yadav Son of Arjun Yadav @ Balmiki Yadav, resident of Village Lakhochak, Police Station Chanan, District- Lakhisarai .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP 138 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-04-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

This is a petition for grant of regular bail for offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The first information report of robbery is against unknown persons. Name of the petitioner has transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Ganauri Yadav. The petitioner has sated on oath that he has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 10.01.2017, neither anything has been recovered from his possession nor he was put on test identification parade. Ganaury Yadav has already been allowed bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 12681 of 2017. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16820 of 2017 (2) dt.11-04-2017 2/2 with Chwara P.S. Case No. 7 of 2015 to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, III, Sheikhpura, or successor Court subjects to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court, concerned, and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Birendra Kumar, J) SA/- U √ T √