Munna Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67980 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2023 Thana- BIHIA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Munna Yadav Son of Late Jagdish Yadav R/O Vill.- Haradiya, P.S. Bihiya, Dist.- Bhojpur 2.

Jay Ram Yadav Son of Late Kishore Yadav R/O Vill.- Haradiya, P.S. Bihiya, Dist.- Bhojpur 3.

Mannu Yadav @ Abhimanu Singh @ Mannu @ Abhimanu Yadav Son of Rama Shankar Yadav R/O Vill.- Haradiya, P.S. Bihiya, Dist.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-02-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 13.11.2023 his named co-villagers along with accused persons including the petitioners came variously armed and assaulted the informant brutally causing injury and when the mother of the informant came to save him, she was also assaulted and her ornament was snatched worth Rs.30,000/-.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67980 of 2024(2) dt.07-02-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that the allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature and the FIR came to be instituted after a delay of 26 days without any plausible explanation which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bihiya P.S. Case No. 311 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T