Leela Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Arbind Kumar Chaudhary, The Principal Secretary, Rural Development D

Patna High Court MJC No.3414 of 2016 (7) dt.26-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3414 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2181 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Leela Devi, Wife of Punit Paswan, Resident of village- Somar, P.O. Pokhar Bhinda, P.S. Riga, District- Sitamarhi.

2. Ram Pramod Rai, Son of Sonelal Rai, Resident of village- Bhawanipur, P.O. Raghopur Bakhari, P.S. Riga, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Arbind Kumar Chaudhary, the Principal Secretary, Rural Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Rajiv Raushan, Son of not known to the petitioner, Presently posted as the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Adv. Ms. Anita Kumari, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, GP-18 Mr. Mukul Prasad AC to GP-18 Ms. Bandana Singh, AC to GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 26-07-2017 Heard the parties.

In view of the statements made at paragraphs 7 to 9 of the supplementary show cause the learned State Counsel was directed to seek instruction from the Principal Secretary as to the release of fund but when the matter is taken up learned counsel for the petitioners does admit that even the balance dues has been paid but in so far as petitioners are concerned their claim has been rejected. He thus seeks permission to question the said order in an appropriate proceeding. Prayer is allowed. The contempt application is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U