Pankaj Sada v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17002 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -141 Year- 2011 Thana -AURAI District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Pankaj Sada, Son of Shivlal Sada, Resident of Village- Parari, P.S.- Aurai, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Trial No. 01 of 2017 arising out of Aurai P.S. Case No. 141 of 2011 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A) and 366 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the sister of the informant, aged about 15 years, was kidnapped by the petitioner with a purpose to marry with her.

Submission is of false implication and that the sister of the informant married to the petitioner out of her own sweet will and consent and out of the wed-lock there is a male child. In the facts and circumstances stated above,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17002 of 2017 (3) dt.08-05-2017 2/2 considering that the petitioner has solemnized marriage with the victim girl and out of the wed-lock there is a son also and the victim is residing in the house of the petitioner and, as such, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Aurai P.S. Case No. 141 of 2011 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T