Raman Kumar Yadav @ Raman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66706 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2024 Thana- KORHA District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.

Raman Kumar Yadav @ Raman Kumar S/O Ramsharan Yadav R/o VillageDevkali Pekha, P.S.- Korha, District- Katihar. 2.

Ramsharan Yadav S/O Late Nago Yadav R/o Village- Devkali Pekha, P.S.- Korha, District- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Mandal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant's husband and her son-in-law.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He fairly submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioners of assaulting the informant's husband, but the injury was found simple in nature. He submits that there is specific overt act against co-accused, Anita, who is said to have assaulted son-in-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66706 of 2024(2) dt.03-10-2024 2/2 law of the informant and the injury was found grievous in nature. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and there is admitted land dispute between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is admitted land dispute between the parties, there is case and counter case between the parties, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Korha P.S. Case No.108 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T