← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1128/2022bail granted

Nathuni Kumar Mishra @ Dipu Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-23Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1128 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2021 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== NATHUNI KUMAR MISHRA @ DIPU MISHRA Son of Shambhu Nath Mishra Resident of Village- Hardiya, Ward No.20, Narkatiyaganj, Police Station- Shikarpur, District- West Chamapran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aditya Nath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 29.05.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and has antecedent of six cases. The informant alleges that on 05.01.2021, at about 5:00 pm, he along with his family members returned to his house and then they saw some unknown thieves had entered the house after breaking the lock and looted gold and silver ornaments and cash Rs. 50,000/- along with other documents as detailed in the F.I.R.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1128 of 2022(2) dt.23-05-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, his name transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused, no incriminating article has been recovered from his possession to connect him with the offence and the police falsely implicated the petitioner based on his antecedents.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 29.05.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case, no incriminating article was recovered from his possession and his name transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 13 of 2021 with a condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, Shambhu Nath Mishra.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T