Umesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16252 of 2015 ====================================================== Umesh Yadav, Son of Ram Chandra Yadav, resident of Mohalla- Banauliya, Post + P.S.- Bihar Sharif, Distt.- Nalanda, Prakhand Chairman Farmer and Agriculture Labour Congress, Bihar Sharif Block, Distt.- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna- 800015.

2. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna Govt. of Bihar.

3. The District Magistrate, Nalanda.

4. Nagar Aukta Nagar Nigam, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda.

5. Superintending Engineer, Bihar Rajya Jal Parshad, West Boring Canal Road, Patna.

6. Executive Engineer, Bihar Rajya Jal Parshad, Ganga Pariyojana, Pramandal No. -4, Karmalichak, Patna- 1.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 02-05-2018 None appears for the petitioner.

This is a public interest litigation which was filed in the year 2015 in default of appearance of the petitioner. It was dismissed on 22.02.2016. Thereafter it was restored by virtue of the order passed on 22.11.2017. When it was listed for orders on admission on 02.04.2018, it was found that the petitioner had made allegation with regard to certain construction activities which had taken place in the year 2015, more than three years back and the petitioner was directed to update the current status

Patna High Court CWJC No.16252 of 2015(4) dt.02-05-2018 2/2 of the activities indicated in the writ petition and amend the writ petition. Even though time was granted on 02.04.2018 for the said purpose, neither the current status with regard to the issue in question has been updated, nor anybody is present when the matter is taken up.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, we are now not inclined to interfere into the matter after a period of more than three years. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Sunil/- U