Patna High CourtCWJC/16816/2015disposed

Lalmani Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-24Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16816 of 2015 =========================================================== Lalmani Singh Son of Sri Pancham Narayan Singh Resident of village - Chainpura, P.O. Chainpura, P.S. Murliganj, Block Banmankhi, District - Purnea .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Department of Primary Education Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Collector, Purnea

5. The District Education officer, Purnea

6. The District Programme Officer, Purnea

7. The Block Development officer, Banmankhi, District - Purnea

8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Chandpur, Block Banmankhi, District - Purnea

9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Chandpur, Block Banmankhi, District - Purnea .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State.

2. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 6, the order dated 16.05.2016 of the respondent no. 7 has been brought on record by which the petitioner has been removed from service as Prakhand Shikshak.

3. Copy of the counter affidavit was served on learned counsel for the petitioner on 25.07.2016 but no rejoinder to the same has been filed.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16816 of 2015 dt.24-07-2018 2/2

4. However, after some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition be disposed off with liberty to assail the order of removal dated 16.05.2016 before the appropriate authority.

5. Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 16.05.2016, passed by the respondent no. 7, by which he has been removed from the post of Prakhand Shikshak, before the appropriate authority, in accordance with law.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U