Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59622/2019bail rejected

Vikash Kumar Singh @ Vikash Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2019-09-20Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59622 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2019 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Singh @ Vikash Rai, Son of Raghunath Rai Resident of Village- Sukloli, P.S.- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajendra Kumar Dubey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ansar Ul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kuchaikot P.S. Case No. 203 of 2019, registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of A.C.J.M.-VII, Gopalganj. The accusation is that Vikash Kumar Singh @ Vikash Rai (petitioner) and his father, Raghunath Rai came near Rabindra Rai, father of the informant, Jagdish Rai, and this petitioner gave Farsa blow at the head of his father. At that time, Raghunath Rai, took cash of Rs.25,000/- from the box kept in his shop. Thereafter, this petitioner also assaulted to Jhunu Pathak causing fracture injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59622 of 2019(2) dt.20-09-2019 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits while the six injuries, as found on the person of Ravindra Rai, are simple in nature but out of two injuries, as found on the person of Jhunu Pathak, caused by this petitioner, injury no. 1 is grievous in nature.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T