← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68525/2024allowed

Pintu Kumar @ Pinta Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-02Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68525 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2024 Thana- MOUZAHIDPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Pintu Kumar @ Pinta Sah, Son of Sri Karu Sah, Resident of Village- Chetu Teli Lane, Gangti Aliganj, Bhagalpur, P.S.- Babarganj, Distt.-Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kr. Thakur, Advocate Mrs.Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-04-2025 Heard Mr. Ajay Kr. Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Mojahidpur P.S. Case No. 21 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 21(c) and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that altogether three persons were apprehended by the police, namely, Rohit Kumar, Dayanand Kumar and Basudeo Kumar and from their possession, altogether 300 gram of brown sugar was recovered. It is submitted that one of the co-accused managed to escape. The name of this petitioner was disclosed by the apprehended persons.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68525 of 2024(5) dt.02-04-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. Recovery if any has been made from the possession of the coaccused persons. He is having criminal antecedent of seven cases and he is on bail in those cases. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.04.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, NDPS, Bhagalpur in connection with Mojahidpur P.S. Case No. 21 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T