Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18260/2017bail granted

Subhash Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-23Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18260 of 2017 (3) dt.23-05-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18260 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2017 Thana -PIRPAINTI District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Subhash Ram Son of Udai Ram @ Udai Singh, Resident of village - Mallikpur, Diyara, P.S. Pirpainti, District - Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bisheshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 23-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pirpainti P.S. Case No. 22 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376/511, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner forcibly tried to commit rape after pressing mouth of the informant but seeing the light of the motorcycle the petitioner and co-accused left her and then she raised alarm and came to her relative at Malikpur Diyara and thereafter, the case was lodged.

Submission is of false implication and that the occurrence is of 24.01.2017 whereas the FIR has been lodged on 25.01.2017 and the petitioner is in custody since 26.01.2017 and now he has sufficiently been penalized.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18260 of 2017 (3) dt.23-05-2017 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. XI, Bhagalpur in connection with Pirpainty P.S. Case No. 22 of 2017, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T