Jamaluddin Khan v. The State Of Bihar Represented Through Sri Ravi Mittal The Principal Secretary Department Of Industr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2931 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4715 of 2015 ====================================================== Jamaluddin Khan son of Late Adbul Mazid, resident of village Chhota Bariyarpur, P.S. Chhautani, East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Represented through Sri Ravi Mittal The Principal Secretary Department of Industry Govt. of Bihar Patna
2. Sri B.K. Shukla, son of not known, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Department of Forest, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
3. Sri M.K. Jiwarajka, son of not know, the Member Secretary, Central Empowered Committee, 2nd Floor, Chanakya Bhawan, Chankyapuri, New Delhi
4. Deputy Inspector General of Wilde Life, Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate Change, 6th Floor, Jor Bagh, Aliganj, New Delhi .... .... Contemnor/Opposite parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Chandra For the State Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to AAG 14 For the Union of India Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Sr. Advocate, Addl. Solicitor General Mr. Sujit Kumar Sinha, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 18-01-2017 Heard Mr. Krishna Chandra for the petitioner and Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Addl. Solicitor General appearing for the Govt. of India, Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, Regional Office (Ranchi).
A copy of the communication dated 13.01.2017 issued by the Conservator of Forest (Central) is produced which taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
It is submitted by Mr. Sanjay that the opposite parties have now nominated the Conservator of Forest, Regional Officer (Ranchi) on the panel of the State Level Committee for Wood
Patna High Court MJC No.2931 of 2015 (10) dt.18-01-2017 2/2 Based Industries of Bihar.
Mr. Chandra states that in the light of the order of this Court passed on the writ petition, the case of the petitioner may be considered by the State Level Committee.
As the said Committee has now been properly constituted, the Court expects the matter concerning the petitioner shall be placed before and considered by the said Committee within a reasonable period of time.
The contempt application is disposed of.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U