Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18415/2017rejected

Dharmendra Chaudhary v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-07-17Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18415 of 2017 (4) dt.17-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18415 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -190 Year- 2016 Thana -KHUSRUPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Dharmendra Chaudhary Son of Late Dhuri Chaudhary, Resident of VillageBhuski, P.S.- Khusrupur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Rekha Devi Wife of Dharmendra Chaudhary D/o Yadunandan Chaudhary Resident of Village- Adilpur, P.S. Fatuha, District Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Nath Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Binod Kumar 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Khusrupur Police Station Case No. 190 of 2016, disclosing offences under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the petitioner happens to be the husband of the informant has never assaulted nor demanded dowry in any form. Hence, the petitioner deserves the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18415 of 2017 (4) dt.17-07-2017 Learned counsel for the opposite party has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of this petitioner and submitted that the petitioner has illicit relation with another lady and he used to assault the informant.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of this petitioner is rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T