Sunil Nat @ Sunil Nut @ Tamanna Nat @ Tamanna Nat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61748 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-335 Year-2024 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran ====================================================== Sunil Nat @ Sunil Nut @ Tamanna Nat @ Tamanna Nat Son of Basant Nut Resident of Village - Tulsi Nagar, P.S.- Kotwali, District - Gajipur (U.P.), At present Village - Bangra, P.S.- Daudpur, District - Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Mili Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case No. 335 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that when the informant was on his way to home, he was intercepted by four miscreants who snatched away his gold chain, lockets and other ornaments along with mobile phone and key of the scooty with which he was travelling on.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61748 of 2025(4) dt.20-02-2026 2/3 transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Arun Nut. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the stolen articles. Learned counsel further submitted that T.I.P. has not been conducted till date to ascertain the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 26.04.2025 and has fourteen criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case No. 335 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioner's own or a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61748 of 2025(4) dt.20-02-2026 3/3 close family member.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed during the trial and shall not remain absent on two consecutive dates without sufficient cause.

(III) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during the course of trial.

(IV) The petitioner shall not commit any offence of a similar nature in future.

In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T