← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5890/2017disposed

Vinay Kumar Pandey And ANR v. The Bihar State Election Commission And ORS

2017-04-19Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5890 of 2017 ===========================================================

1. Vinay Kumar Pandey, S/o Late Shankar Dayal Pandey, resident of Ward No. 5, P.O.+ P.S.- Sahpur, District-Bhojpur at Ara.

2. Ganesh Prasad Singh, S/o Late Ramdeo Singh, resident of Ward No. -5, P.O. + P.S.- Sahpur, District- Bhojpur at Ara.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar State Election Commission, Sone Bhawan, Veer Chand Patel Path, Patna-800001, represented through its Secretary, the Bihar State Election Commission, Sone Bhawan, Veer Chand Patel Path, Patna-800001.

2. The Secretary, the Bihar State Election Commission, Sone Bhawan, Veer Chand Patel Path, Patna-800001.

3. The District Magistrate-cum-District Election Officer (Municipality), Bhojpur at Ara.

4. The Registration Officer, Voter List of Nagar Panchayat Sahpur, DistrictBhojpur at Ara. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shri Prakash Srivastava, Advocate For the SEC :

Mr. Amit Shrivastava and Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocates =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State Election Commission.

2. Though the petitioners are aggrieved by some alleged irregularities in preparation of the voter list for Ward No. 5 of the Nagar Panchayat, Sahpur in the district of Bhojpur but from the pleadings, it appears that the objections were required to be filed within a certain period, after final publication of the voter list, which does not appear to have been done.

3. In view thereof, the Court is not inclined to interfere

Patna High Court CWJC No.5890 of 2017 dt.19-04-2017 2/2 in the matter at this late stage.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U