Abdul Rahman @ Abdur Rahman v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62298 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-966 Year-2018 Thana- SAHARSA District- Saharsa ====================================================== ABDUL RAHMAN @ ABDUR RAHMAN Son of Md. Kamruddin Resident of Village - Karhara , P.S.- Mahishi and Dist.- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Diwakar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2020 Heard the parties.
This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. No.48 of 2019 corresponding to Saharsa Sadar P.S.Case No.966 of 2018 for the offences under Sections 302, 120(b), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case the brother of the informant had gone to his Sasural by motorcycle and since then he is traceless and later on by a whats app message the informant came to know about the death of his brother and found the dead body with stabbing mark on his neck. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is not named in the FIR and later on his name transpired only in the supervision note and there is no incriminating circumstances against the petitioner except that it
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62298 of 2019(3) dt.06-02-2020 2/2 is alleged by some witnesses that he used to sit in the room of the wife of the deceased.
Heard learned A.P.P. , who has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that key of the motorcycle of the deceased was found from the room of the petitioner and the witnesses also shows suspicion against the petitioner and his involvement in the present case.
Having heard both sides and considering the submissions as made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of six months since petitioner is in custody since 13.10.2018, and if not concluded, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U