Anshu Prasad Chourasiya v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Bihar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1322 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2022 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Anshu Prasad Chourasiya Son of Dina Nath Prasad R/o Village - Adhmauli, P.S.- Kuchaykot, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, Bihar 2.

The Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. Bihar 3.

The District Magistrate, District - Gopalganj. Bihar 4.

The Superintendent of Police, District - Gopalganj. Bihar 5.

The SHO, Kuchaykot Police Station, District - Gopalganj. Bihar 6.

Shikha Kumari Daughter of Vinod Pathak R/o Village - Balthari, P.S.- Kuchaykot, District - Gopalganj 7.

Seema Devi Wife of Vinod Pathak R/o Village - Balthari, P.S.- Kuchaykot, District - Gopalganj 8.

Vinod Pathak Son of Not Known R/o Village - Balthari, P.S.- Kuchaykot, District - Gopalganj ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Nadim Seraj ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 22-11-2022 The petitioner claims to be the husband of respondent No. 6. He is seeking a direction to the State respondents to provide adequate security to the petitioner as well as private respondent No. 6 who have, according to the petitioner married each other against the wishes of the parents of

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1322 of 2022(2) dt.22-11-2022 2/2 respondent No. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that presently respondent No. 6 is in custody of respondents No. 7 and 8, who are her parents. In our view this writ application is completely misconceived, petitioner has only misconstrued the provisions of Cr.P.C. which he has apparently invoked. This application is merit-less and is accordingly dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ( Chandra Prakash Singh, J) anand/- U T