Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68856/2024bail rejected

Chandani Devi @ Chanda Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-01Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68856 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-267 Year-2024 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Chandani Devi @ Chanda Devi W/O Dharmendra Sahani Resident of VillageRosra Pokhar, P.S- Gaighat, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raju Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 01-10-2024 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No.267 of 2024 lodged dated 19.05.2024 under Sections 302/ 201 of the I.P.C.

3. As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against unknown accused persons against whom there is allegation of murder of the husband of the informant.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68856 of 2024(2) dt.01-10-2024 2/2

5. Learned Counsel further submits that the said recovery of mobile which belongs to the deceased, has been made from his possession of the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner has purchased the said mobile from other person.

6. Learned Counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 04.07.2024 having clean antecedent.

7. Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the alleged mobile which belongs to the deceased, has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

8. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected, but liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T