Karu Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50161 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -5 Year- 2015 Thana -RAJAULI District- NAWADA ====================================================== Karu Choudhary, Son of Soukhi Choudhary, Resident of Village - Lodipur, P.S. - Akbarpur, District - Nawada.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 10-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the FIR was lodged against unknown, however, he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of his alleged confessional statement. It is further contended that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He is in custody since 30.03.2015.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Karu Choudhary is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50161 of 2015 (2) dt.10-11-2015 2/2 satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, Nawada in connection with Sessions Trial No.324 of 2015/109 of 2015 arising out of Rajauli P.S. Case No.5/2015, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be his father.
Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.
If the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T